Connecticut Green Times

July 31, 2009

Students against the war plan G20 protest

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tim McKee @ 2:35 pm

CT STUDENTS AGAINST THE WAR
NATIONAL G20 ORGANIZING UPDATE

Featuring

David Hoskins and Natalie Goncharov

David and Natalie are organizers for Fight Imperialism Stand Together (FIST) and are currently organizing for the protests and actions against the G20 summit in Pittsburgh, PA. A list of G20 events can be found here. Report will be followed by a discussion on G20 organizing.

AND
SUMMER MEETING

AT 

8/2 2PM
Church of the Holy Trinity
381 Main Street, Middletown, CT

Spread the Word!

TENTATIVE AGENDA
1. G20 Update and political report featuring guest speakers from NYC

2. Vote on OCT 17th endorsement 3. Educational Campaign
- Literature Selection
- Speakers / Speakers Bureau
4. G20 Organizing Update
    - United Call released
    - Updates on local outreach
5. Open Floor / Other Business

July 29, 2009

How Senator Dodd Caused the Financial Crisis

Filed under: Uncategorized — David Bedell @ 3:46 pm

By James Lavin

In Part 1, I criticized Sen. Dodd for writing the legislation – HAVA – that pushed unauditable, privately operated electronic voting machines into American elections and for fighting – for years – against paper audit trails, thus undermining Americans’ trust in the legitimacy and integrity of our elections and our ability to verify election “results.”

In Part 2, I show that Sen. Dodd was uniquely positioned to prevent the banking crisis but utterly failed Connecticut and America.

Sen. Dodd – Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee – has taken millions of dollars from financial institutions to not do his job:

Why does Dodd – a long-term incumbent in a small state – need all this money? And why are powerful financial firms so eager to give Dodd money?

They wanted a friend running the Senate Banking Committee, a friend who wouldn’t push new regulations or tough enforcement of existing regulations. And that’s exactly what they got for their money.

What did we citizens get for Dodd’s close friendship with the finance industry? Dodd’s failure to regulate banks led directly to:

  • A financial crisis
  • Bank failures
  • A deep, protracted recession
  • Massive job losses
  • Plummeting home values
  • Trillions in taxpayer subsidies for failed banks that we and future generations must pay back
  • Inflation expectations – due to the debt incurred to bail out banks – that will make government and private borrowing far more expensive for decades to come

During Dodd’s watch as Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, the U.S. banking system collapsed as it had not since the Great Depression. This occurred because Congress tore down laws preventing banks and other financial insitutions from taking massive risks. And then Congress failed to watch – let alone regulate – what those financial institutions were doing.

No one was better positioned to prevent the madness than Dodd.

But Dodd was part of the problem, not the solution. One landmark law – The Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 (informally called Gramm-Leach-Bliley) – repealed essential legislation – the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 – put in place after the Great Depression to prevent another banking crisis.

Dodd voted “yes” on repealing Glass-Steagall and gutting the Bank Holding Company Act. Shamefully, only eight Senators – including five of the best (Boxer, Dorgan, Feingold, Harkin and Wellstone) – voted “no.”

Sen. Dodd absolutely should have known he was pulling the pin on a hand grenade. Many others shouted loudly that deregulation would cause a financial crisis & taxpayer bailouts:

  • Ralph Nader knew: “These conglomerates will be the financial equivalent of nuclear bombs. The explosion of even one could have a disastrous impact not only on the U.S. economy but on financial systems around the world.”
  • Molly Ivins knew: “Watch the banking industry dig its own grave. Watch supposedly smart people set up a financial disaster… Not since Congress passed the Garn-St. Germain bill in 1981 - the one that deregulated the S&Ls and unleashed a half-a-trillion-dollar disaster, which the taxpayers of this country wound up paying for - has there been a move to match this for pure folly… The most obvious risk is that a blunder in the insurance or brokerage end of the business could bring down a bank, putting insured deposits at risk. The taxpayers, of course, then wind up with the tab, as we did with the savings-and-loan mess.”
  • Senator Byron Dorgan knew: “This bill will also, in my judgment, raise the likelihood of future massive taxpayer bailouts. It will fuel the consolidation and mergers in the banking and financial services industry at the expense of customers, farm businesses, family farmers, and others, and in some instances I think it inappropriately limits the ability of the banking and thrift institution regulators from monitoring activities between such institutions and their insurance or securities affiliates and subsidiaries raising significant safety and soundness consumer protection concerns.” Sen. Dorgan even predicted the timeframe: “I think we will look back in 10 years’ time and say we should not have done this but we did because we forgot the lessons of the past, and that that which is true in the 1930’s is true in 2010.”
  • Senator Paul Wellstone knew: “This is the wrong kind of modernization because it fails to put in place adequate regulatory safeguards for these new financial giants whose failure could jeopardize the entire economy. It is the wrong kind of modernization because taxpayers could be stuck with the bill if these conglomerates become ‘too big to fail.’” He continued: “We are flirting with disaster. We are strolling casually along the upper decks of the Titanic, oblivious to the dangers ahead of us. Remember, the Titanic in its day symbolized the ultimate triumph of technology and progress. Just like these new financial conglomerates, it was considered ‘too big to fail.’ Because everybody assumed this flagship of Western technology was unsinkable, they saw no need to take ordinary precautions. They disregarded the usual rules of speed and safety, as Congress is now doing with [this legislation].”

Most damagingly, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Dodd failed to regulate derivatives. Since at least the mid-1990s, experts had been calling for derivatives regulation. In 1994, the government’s own Government Accounting Office (GAO) issued a 200-page GAO report calling for regulation of the exploding derivatives market. The report warned that failure to regulate derivatives could result in “a financial bailout paid for by taxpayers.”

Passing such legislation was Senate Banking Committee chairman Dodd’s job. He failed.

Public Citizen explains Congress’ central role in bringing on the banking crisis:

The current financial crisis is the natural and logical result of a failed financial regulatory system that placed an irrational faith in the ability of markets to self-correct. As a result, regulators ignored repeated warnings about the over-the-counter derivatives markets, problems with securitization and lax mortgage underwriting standards, excessive leverage in financial institutions, and the general movement of financial activity into increasingly complex and opaque forms…

This has allowed institutions to structure complex transactions and take on risky exposures without fulfilling the regulatory requirements Congress deemed necessary to prevent a systemic financial crisis after the Great Depression. These unregulated and under-regulated activities and institutions, the “shadow financial system,” were permitted to become so intertwined with the real economy that the government has chosen to use taxpayers’ money to bail them out when they failed.

No one was better positioned to understand the dangers or empowered to prevent them than Senate Banking Chairman Dodd. And when problems first appeared, instead of addressing them, he moved to Iowa and launched a presidential campaign.

It doesn’t matter whether Dodd was simply ignorant of the massive risks banks were taking or seduced by power and money. He failed, and America and Connecticut will pay a dear price for decades to come. It’s time for Sen. Dodd to go.

###

James Lavin is an economist and blogger in Stamford. This article was originally published as “Please retire Chris Dodd from the Senate (Part 2)” on his blog, James Lavin — Blogging the Bust.

Joan Baez sings at N.Y.C. Green Party fundraiser!

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tim McKee @ 2:57 pm

Here’s a little musical inspiration for you.

Joan Baez sings “We shall overcome” with Rev. Billy Talen, NYC Green 
Party mayoral candidate, & the Church of Life After Shopping.
http://bit.ly/ZNprg

July 1, 2009

Larson on Health Care

Filed under: health care — admin @ 1:06 pm

First District Congressman John Larson answered 24 questions from a Manchester audience yesterday, assuring the crowd of about 100 people that he would try his hardest to get a public insurance option in the health care bill now under construction in Congress and that the President would sign such a bill if it passed both houses. The town-meeting-style assembly to discuss health care legislation included brief remarks from a Boston physician and about an hour of questions from the audience.

Most in the audience were single-payer advocates and a considerable number were part of organized advocacy groups. Larson addressed this crowd directly in saying that he “gets it” on health care financing. He says he’s committed to a “uniquely American” approach, preserving existing health insurance schemes and adding a Medicare-type option for anybody who wants it. He said he’s not for single-payer insurance–Medicare for all–because it doesn’t have enough support to pass in the House of Representatives.

Larson expressed concern about the 40,000 people in Connecticut who work in the insurance industry. He seems to believe they will all lose their jobs immediately if the government provides taxpayer-funded health care. Challenged to impose party discipline on the health care issue as chairman of the House Democratic caucus, he wouldn’t commit to any action against Democrats who oppose a public option.

He was defiant of a couple of anti-immigration hecklers who were concerned that the nation spends billions on health care for illegals. He mentioned that those here without papers are mostly hard-working people like the rest of us and that the government should deal with them humanely.

He could have answered more questions, but his style–padding his responses with lots of pleasant-sounding flourishes–always leaves some questions hanging.

Powered by WordPress